
![]()
Water Savings
How does
conventional irrigation waste water?
All forms of conventional irrigation ultimately
pour water into the soil. The soil is a very leaky container. It loses water
both above and below: Above by evaporation; Below by flow into the water table.
Only a very small fraction of irrigation water is actually absorbed by the
plants, which are the intended recipients. The rest is wasted.

The
diagram above makes it easy to see how little water it actually intercepts from
the amount provided by conventional irrigation. The tiny roots of the plant
must compete for water against the much larger ground surface and water table.

This
diagram shows how much less water is required using Direct
Irrigation. The water goes directly to the plant, then a
small portion is overflowed each week to remove accumulated solutes.
How much
water does Direct Irrigation save?
To put this into perspective, look at these
tables:
We use 10% as a nominal estimate here; it may be more or less in practice
depending upon circumstances.
Table 1: Water Input Held Constant at 100 Liters
|
Conventional Irrigation |
100 liters in |
90 liters
wasted to evaporation and water table |
10 liters used
by plants |
efficiency 10% |
|
Direct Irrigation |
100 liters in |
90 liters to
plants |
10 liters
wasted to evaporation and water table |
efficiency 90% |
Table 2: Water Absorbed by Plants Held Constant at
100 Liters
|
Conventional Irrigation |
100 liters to
plants |
900 liters
wasted |
1000 liters
required |
|
|
Direct Irrigation |
100 liters to
plants |
11 liters
wasted |
111 liters
required |
89% savings
compared to Conventional Irrigation |
The
growing plant gets more water from Direct Irrigation than it would from irrigation via soil because the plant gets
the water first, before it can be lost !
Copyright
2005; All technology in this web site is protected by US and foreign
intellectual property laws